“You can see where individual references were taken out of context,” said Van Voorhis’ attorney James Murphy of San Francisco’s Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney in papers filed Thursday.
On Dec. 19, the Commission on Judicial Performance announced it would initiate a formal hearing into the allegations. In 1992, the commission chided the judge for similar behavior and Van Voorhis penned a public apology.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
