But it declined to do the same thing in a companion case, holding that lawyers’ suits seeking indemnification of malpractice damages from co-counsel should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
The latter ruling prompted Justice Janice Rogers Brown — who authored both opinions — to issue an unusual concurrence to her own ruling, in which she said she would have preferred to adopt a blanket rule.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
