9th Cir.;
14-36094
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that the federal rules allowing additional time to effect service of process on defendants following removal do not extend or revive a state statute of limitations.
May 30, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-36094
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that the federal rules allowing additional time to effect service of process on defendants following removal do not extend or revive a state statute of limitations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS