9th Cir.;
14-55919
The court of appeals reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that the district court erred in finding an employee disability plan’s denial of benefits was subject to review for abuse of discretion only.
May 11, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-55919
The court of appeals reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that the district court erred in finding an employee disability plan’s denial of benefits was subject to review for abuse of discretion only.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS