SAN FRANCISCO — When trial commenced earlier this month in U.S. District Judge William Alsup’s courtroom, Oracle Corp. seemed to have all the momentum in its copyright rematch with Google Inc.

It had an energetic new trial team led by Peter Bicks and Annette Hurst from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. It had a streamlined case. And it had a favorable determination from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit establishing that Google infringed copyrights for basic elements of the Java programming language in building its hugely profitable Android mobile operating system. What the jury was left to decide was whether Google’s use of 37 application programming interfaces, or APIs, in Android was a protected fair use under copyright law.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]