SAN FRANCISCO — Plaintiffs lawyers who have spent nearly three years battling app-based ride service Lyft Inc. have an awkward task ahead of them as they try to secure a peace deal: persuading a federal judge to approve a $12.25 million class action settlement that in some ways runs counter to the initial objective of their employment suit.

In Cotter v. Lyft, 13-4065, lawyers representing Lyft drivers argued that their clients were employees, entitled to reimbursement for gas and other costs that they incurred on the job. But under the terms of the proposed settlement, the drivers will instead more firmly hold independent-contractor status. And on average, they will receive very little money.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]