The average person probably believes it must be illegal for a corporate insider to purchase or sell stock based on confidential information or provide the information to an outside trader. However, a bombshell ruling by an influential federal appeals court could make such conduct perfectly legal. The decision also emphasized the need for a statutory definition of insider trading.
In U.S. v. Newman, Nos. 13-1837, 13-1917 (Dec. 10, 2014), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers New York, Connecticut and Vermont, reversed the convictions after a jury trial of two hedge fund portfolio managers, Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson. They were charged with trading on behalf of their funds in the stocks of Dell Computer and NVIDIA based on confidential financial information divulged by employees at both companies. Newman was sentenced to 54 months in prison and required to pay over $1.7 million, while Chiasson was sentenced to 78 months in prison and required to pay almost $6.4 million.
Far From Primary
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
