SACRAMENTO — The Commission on Judicial Performance publicly released a set of amended disciplinary rules for jurists on May 16. And the state’s largest judges lobby isn’t too happy about the changes — or lack of them.
For more than a year, the California Judges Association has been pushing the judicial watchdog agency to give targeted jurists more information about the allegations made against them, including the names of witnesses and access to sealed records and transcripts. The judges also want more assurance that they won’t be disciplined solely for non-malicious legal errors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
