SACRAMENTO — Election Day was a good one for California’s courts even though they weren’t on the ballot.

When voters passed Proposition 30, the governor’s temporary tax measure, they eliminated the threat of $6 billion in promised spending reductions. Although those so-called trigger cuts were aimed mostly at schools, judiciary leaders feared that politicians — loathe to cut popular education programs — could turn their sights to Lady Justice.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]