May 07, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 1st
A129379
The First Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part four judgments. The court held that plaintiffs should have been permitted to amended causes of action for negligence and strict liability where they alleged that a manufacturers product, when used as intended, caused the release of asbestos dust.
'Old School' Expectations Plague Young Lawyer Mental Health—But Not All Predecessors Are Sympathetic
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
