The state Supreme Court agreed to decide if recorded witness statements are priviliged, and if a lawyer can speak out against a former client's project.
June 09, 2010 at 05:00 PM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO Stephen Kane urged the state’s highest court three months ago to clarify a contested issue over attorney work-product privilege.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal justice got his wish today when the California Supreme Court agreed to decide whether witness statements recorded by attorneys or their representatives are open to discovery.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
