Correction: An earlier version of the story misstated which attorneys Dena Sharp said decided against sharing “the most basic information” about how they’re going to plead their claims. Sharp said it was attorneys representing publishers that had done so. Additionally, it was a brief from attorneys representing publishers that the judge said raised concerns that the firms were still litigating her decision to relate the publisher and advertiser cases.

A federal judge questioned whether she made a mistake in relating antitrust lawsuits against Google brought by advertisers and publishers after discussions over the proposed leadership structure has stirred a power struggle between the attorneys representing advertisers in the case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]