X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Tyler Young, Rory Collins and Emily Zambrana of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath (Photo: Courtesy Photo)

The Ninth Circuit recently upheld the dismissal of a consumer fraud class action brought under California law because the plaintiff had an adequate legal remedy. This decision may have significant implications outside of California courts. Any state with a statutory scheme similar to California’s—with one or more consumer protection statutes providing for both legal damages and monetary equitable relief—is susceptible to a similar adequate-remedy-at-law defense.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Law Firms Mentioned

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.