The California Supreme Court in Ixchel Pharma LLC v. Biogen, (Aug. 3, 2020, No. S256927), issued an important opinion with far-reaching application to litigation challenging business agreements.

California Business and Profession Code Section 16600 provides that “every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void.” The court, having previously held that employee noncompete agreements are void (subject to statutory exceptions), held that a rule of reason analysis applies in determining whether a business contract implicates Section 16600. In so holding, the court rejected an argument that any agreement that restrains trade is per se illegal under Section 16600. Instead, where an agreement, outside the employment context, limits other business transactions, the agreement is unlawful when the “agreement harms competition more than it helps” after considering various factors.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]