An appeals court affirmed approval of a settlement over Facebook’s scanning of private messages while also pushing back against the social media giant’s assertions that the class lacks standing.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that users, who claimed Facebook probed their private messages to catalog URLs shared within the chats, got a fair shake in the 2017 no-cash deal, and rejected the objections of Anna St. John and her colleagues at the Center for Class Action Fairness that users received only “worthless injunctive relief.” With damages claims already booted from the case at the time of the settlement, the panel noted that the class only had injunctive or declaratory avenues for relief.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]