Judge Orders Coinbase to Turn Over Info on 14,000-Plus Account Holders
A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
November 29, 2017 at 06:56 PM
8 minute read
Updated at 5:57 P.M. PST with comment from Coinbase
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley of the Northern District of California in an order dated Tuesday ruled that the IRS had successfully shown that the information it is seeking is relevant to its investigation of whether U.S. taxpayers are significantly underreporting gains from trading bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
“That only 800 to 900 taxpayers reported gains related to bitcoin in each of the relevant years and that more than 14,000 Coinbase users have either bought, sold, sent or received at least $20,000 worth of bitcoin in a given year suggests that many Coinbase users may not be reporting their bitcoin gains,” Corley wrote.
According to her judgment, which was entered Wednesday afternoon, Coinbase must turn over the taxpayer ID number, name, birthdate, address, account records and invoices for any account “with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive)” during an annual period between 2013 and 2015.
Coinbase has said in the litigation that those parameters would capture some 14,355 account holders. Corley noted in her order it would not include those who simply bought and held bitcoin during that period of time.
Although the result is a win for the IRS, Corley denied the agency's demands for a broader swath of records—including copies of passports or driver's licenses, wallet addresses, and public keys for cryptocurrency wallets.
She wrote that the IRS would only need such information if there is potentially a taxable gain, and if there is some doubt as to the taxpayer's identity. “If there is not, these additional records will not shed any light on a legitimate investigation,” the judge wrote.
“Courts must ensure that the government is not collecting thousands and thousands of personal records unnecessarily,” she added.
“We are pleased to say Coinbase won a partial victory in court today,” David Farmer, director of communications at Coinbase, said in a blog post Wednesday. “Although the court did not completely quash the government summons compelling disclosure of certain customers' records … we were proud to accomplish two important victories for our customers.”
In addition to shielding that additional customer information, Farmer said that as a result of Coinbase pushing back against the original summons from the IRS, more than 480,000 of the company's customers' records “were preserved from disclosure.” He added that the company is still in the process of reviewing the judge's order. The lead lawyer for the exchange in the case, Steven Ellis of Goodwin Procter, deferred a request for comment to the company.
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon. It had sought an even broader swath of information on account holders at Coinbase, which claims to have over 5 million users. The case has been seen as one of the first tests of tax authorities' ability to unmask the identities of holders of cryptocurrency.
Legal challenges are shaping new technologies. And emerging tech, like digital currency, AI and facial recognition, are challenging existing legal frameworks. Peer around the corner with What's Next, a new briefing on the legal frontiers of technology. Sign up now for a free trial.
Updated at 5:57 P.M. PST with comment from Coinbase
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley of the Northern District of California in an order dated Tuesday ruled that the IRS had successfully shown that the information it is seeking is relevant to its investigation of whether U.S. taxpayers are significantly underreporting gains from trading bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
“That only 800 to 900 taxpayers reported gains related to bitcoin in each of the relevant years and that more than 14,000 Coinbase users have either bought, sold, sent or received at least $20,000 worth of bitcoin in a given year suggests that many Coinbase users may not be reporting their bitcoin gains,” Corley wrote.
According to her judgment, which was entered Wednesday afternoon, Coinbase must turn over the taxpayer ID number, name, birthdate, address, account records and invoices for any account “with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive)” during an annual period between 2013 and 2015.
Coinbase has said in the litigation that those parameters would capture some 14,355 account holders. Corley noted in her order it would not include those who simply bought and held bitcoin during that period of time.
Although the result is a win for the IRS, Corley denied the agency's demands for a broader swath of records—including copies of passports or driver's licenses, wallet addresses, and public keys for cryptocurrency wallets.
She wrote that the IRS would only need such information if there is potentially a taxable gain, and if there is some doubt as to the taxpayer's identity. “If there is not, these additional records will not shed any light on a legitimate investigation,” the judge wrote.
“Courts must ensure that the government is not collecting thousands and thousands of personal records unnecessarily,” she added.
“We are pleased to say Coinbase won a partial victory in court today,” David Farmer, director of communications at Coinbase, said in a blog post Wednesday. “Although the court did not completely quash the government summons compelling disclosure of certain customers' records … we were proud to accomplish two important victories for our customers.”
In addition to shielding that additional customer information, Farmer said that as a result of Coinbase pushing back against the original summons from the IRS, more than 480,000 of the company's customers' records “were preserved from disclosure.” He added that the company is still in the process of reviewing the judge's order. The lead lawyer for the exchange in the case, Steven Ellis of
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon. It had sought an even broader swath of information on account holders at Coinbase, which claims to have over 5 million users. The case has been seen as one of the first tests of tax authorities' ability to unmask the identities of holders of cryptocurrency.
Legal challenges are shaping new technologies. And emerging tech, like digital currency, AI and facial recognition, are challenging existing legal frameworks. Peer around the corner with What's Next, a new briefing on the legal frontiers of technology. Sign up now for a free trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250