Judge Orders Coinbase to Turn Over Info on 14,000-Plus Account Holders
A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
November 29, 2017 at 06:56 PM
8 minute read
Updated at 5:57 P.M. PST with comment from Coinbase
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley of the Northern District of California in an order dated Tuesday ruled that the IRS had successfully shown that the information it is seeking is relevant to its investigation of whether U.S. taxpayers are significantly underreporting gains from trading bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
“That only 800 to 900 taxpayers reported gains related to bitcoin in each of the relevant years and that more than 14,000 Coinbase users have either bought, sold, sent or received at least $20,000 worth of bitcoin in a given year suggests that many Coinbase users may not be reporting their bitcoin gains,” Corley wrote.
According to her judgment, which was entered Wednesday afternoon, Coinbase must turn over the taxpayer ID number, name, birthdate, address, account records and invoices for any account “with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive)” during an annual period between 2013 and 2015.
Coinbase has said in the litigation that those parameters would capture some 14,355 account holders. Corley noted in her order it would not include those who simply bought and held bitcoin during that period of time.
Although the result is a win for the IRS, Corley denied the agency's demands for a broader swath of records—including copies of passports or driver's licenses, wallet addresses, and public keys for cryptocurrency wallets.
She wrote that the IRS would only need such information if there is potentially a taxable gain, and if there is some doubt as to the taxpayer's identity. “If there is not, these additional records will not shed any light on a legitimate investigation,” the judge wrote.
“Courts must ensure that the government is not collecting thousands and thousands of personal records unnecessarily,” she added.
“We are pleased to say Coinbase won a partial victory in court today,” David Farmer, director of communications at Coinbase, said in a blog post Wednesday. “Although the court did not completely quash the government summons compelling disclosure of certain customers' records … we were proud to accomplish two important victories for our customers.”
In addition to shielding that additional customer information, Farmer said that as a result of Coinbase pushing back against the original summons from the IRS, more than 480,000 of the company's customers' records “were preserved from disclosure.” He added that the company is still in the process of reviewing the judge's order. The lead lawyer for the exchange in the case, Steven Ellis of Goodwin Procter, deferred a request for comment to the company.
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon. It had sought an even broader swath of information on account holders at Coinbase, which claims to have over 5 million users. The case has been seen as one of the first tests of tax authorities' ability to unmask the identities of holders of cryptocurrency.
Legal challenges are shaping new technologies. And emerging tech, like digital currency, AI and facial recognition, are challenging existing legal frameworks. Peer around the corner with What's Next, a new briefing on the legal frontiers of technology. Sign up now for a free trial.
Updated at 5:57 P.M. PST with comment from Coinbase
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge has ordered Coinbase to comply with a summons from the Internal Revenue Service that seeks personal information on more than 14,000 account holders on the cryptocurrency exchange.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley of the Northern District of California in an order dated Tuesday ruled that the IRS had successfully shown that the information it is seeking is relevant to its investigation of whether U.S. taxpayers are significantly underreporting gains from trading bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
“That only 800 to 900 taxpayers reported gains related to bitcoin in each of the relevant years and that more than 14,000 Coinbase users have either bought, sold, sent or received at least $20,000 worth of bitcoin in a given year suggests that many Coinbase users may not be reporting their bitcoin gains,” Corley wrote.
According to her judgment, which was entered Wednesday afternoon, Coinbase must turn over the taxpayer ID number, name, birthdate, address, account records and invoices for any account “with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive)” during an annual period between 2013 and 2015.
Coinbase has said in the litigation that those parameters would capture some 14,355 account holders. Corley noted in her order it would not include those who simply bought and held bitcoin during that period of time.
Although the result is a win for the IRS, Corley denied the agency's demands for a broader swath of records—including copies of passports or driver's licenses, wallet addresses, and public keys for cryptocurrency wallets.
She wrote that the IRS would only need such information if there is potentially a taxable gain, and if there is some doubt as to the taxpayer's identity. “If there is not, these additional records will not shed any light on a legitimate investigation,” the judge wrote.
“Courts must ensure that the government is not collecting thousands and thousands of personal records unnecessarily,” she added.
“We are pleased to say Coinbase won a partial victory in court today,” David Farmer, director of communications at Coinbase, said in a blog post Wednesday. “Although the court did not completely quash the government summons compelling disclosure of certain customers' records … we were proud to accomplish two important victories for our customers.”
In addition to shielding that additional customer information, Farmer said that as a result of Coinbase pushing back against the original summons from the IRS, more than 480,000 of the company's customers' records “were preserved from disclosure.” He added that the company is still in the process of reviewing the judge's order. The lead lawyer for the exchange in the case, Steven Ellis of
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon. It had sought an even broader swath of information on account holders at Coinbase, which claims to have over 5 million users. The case has been seen as one of the first tests of tax authorities' ability to unmask the identities of holders of cryptocurrency.
Legal challenges are shaping new technologies. And emerging tech, like digital currency, AI and facial recognition, are challenging existing legal frameworks. Peer around the corner with What's Next, a new briefing on the legal frontiers of technology. Sign up now for a free trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute read‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250