C.A. 2nd;
B271781
The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute.
C.A. 2nd; B271781 The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected…
September 25, 2017 at 06:29 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B271781
The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS