9th Cir.;
16-15342
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the privacy interest of former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainees outweighed any public interest in the release of their names.
9th Cir.; 16-15342 The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the privacy interest of former U.S. Immigration and Customs…
September 15, 2017 at 06:05 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
16-15342
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the privacy interest of former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainees outweighed any public interest in the release of their names.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS