9th Cir.; 15-55880 The court of appeals reversed a judgment. The court held that a lack of clarity in a statement of modifications to a retiree health…
September 11, 2017 at 06:29 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
15-55880
The court of appeals reversed a judgment. The court held that a lack of clarity in a statement of modifications to a retiree health plan violated the disclosure requirements of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
