C.A. 4th;
D071661
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part a dependency court order. The court held that a father’s consistent involvement in his child’s life was not required in order for him to qualify as a putative parent; however, he could not qualify as a third parent absent a showing of detriment to the child in the absence of such a designation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
