C.A. 3rd;
C081760
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that appellate counsel’s “egregious violations of basic appellate norms” warranted forfeiture of appellant’s claims.
C.A. 3rd; C081760 The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that appellate counsel’s “egregious violations of basic…
July 28, 2017 at 05:00 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd;
C081760
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that appellate counsel’s “egregious violations of basic appellate norms” warranted forfeiture of appellant’s claims.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS