Construction Contract • Exculpatory Clause • Differing Conditions Provision
Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc. et al, PICS Case No. 17-1392 (C.P. Lawrence April 27, 2017) Hodge, J. (16 pages).
Where the defendant contractor’s contract with the plaintiff county contained both differing condition and exculpatory provisions, the jury was charged with resolving the conflicting contractual provisions based upon the evidence presented. The court denied the moving parties’ joint motion in limine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
