Trial court properly found that surety's obligations were discharged in case where seller of property had signed a surety agreement to enable buyer to purchase property. Affirmed.
July 01, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Surety Agreement • Affirmative Defense • Impairment of Collateral • Discharge
Newman v. DeSalvo, PICS Case No. 16-0819 (Pa. Super. June 9, 2016) (memorandum) Gantman, P.J. (19 pages).
Trial court properly found that surety’s obligations were discharged in case where seller of property had signed a surety agreement to enable buyer to purchase property. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
