Insurer did not breach for failure to pay underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits where insured's policy had lapsed/expired, and insured's failure to pay the premium to renew the policy constituted an overt act to cancel the policy. Order of the trial court affirmed.
May 24, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
INSURANCE LAW
Underinsured Motorist Coverage • Denial of Benefits • Notice of Expired/Cancelled Policy • Removal to Federal Court • Bad Faith
Racioppi v. Progressive Ins. Co., PICS Case No. 16-0639 (Pa. Super. May 11, 2016) (memorandum) Ford Elliott, P.J. (13 pages).
'Old School' Expectations Plague Young Lawyer Mental Health—But Not All Predecessors Are Sympathetic
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
