Mortgage Foreclosure • Court-Ordered Discontinuance • Motion for Counsel Fees • Act 6 Notice Violation • Prevailing Party
Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc. v. Psut, PICS Case No. 16-0618 (Pa. Super. May 6, 2016) (memorandum) Ott, J. (7 pages).
A homeowner in a mortgage foreclosure action was not entitled to attorneys’ fees from the mortgage company after the action was discontinued due to the company’s failure to provide Act 6 notices, where homeowner was not a “prevailing party.” Order of the trial court affirmed.
