The tax board erred when it determined it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal of interest and liens from a bill for clean and seal work due to the untimeliness of the appeal.
May 06, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Clean and Seal Work • Petition for Review of City Charges • Nunc Pro Tunc Appeal • Reversal of Decision on the Merits
Murray v. Tax Review Bd., PICS Case No. 16-0561 (C.P. Philadelphia April 4, 2016) Padilla, J. (10 pages).
The tax board erred when it determined it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal of interest and liens from a bill for clean and seal work due to the untimeliness of the appeal.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
