An oncologist’s expert testimony in a medical malpractice case against a podiatrist did not compromise the validity of the plaintiff’s verdict, the state Superior Court has ruled, upholding a $750,000 award.
The court affirmed a ruling of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas on April 16 in Wilson v. King, a medical malpractice case involving cancer of the foot. In addition to ruling on the expert witness, the Superior Court said the trial court did not err in reducing the jury verdict from $1.1 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
