A gas company has the right to eminent domain in order to recast one of its pipelines, the Third Circuit has ruled in a thorny split opinion that the dissent warned is so broad that it grants, essentially, unfettered property access to a private company.
The majority, led by Judge Marjorie Rendell, approached the case as a simple reading of the regulatory framework, which offers a clear answer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
