Most of the federal government’s authority is exercised, on a day-to-day basis, through its administrative agencies. Central to the efficiency of those agencies such as it is is the judiciary’s substantial deference to agency decision-making. Without that deference, people and corporations would often have an incentive to try to impair (or at least delay) agencies’ actions through court challenges.
Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court recently suggested their willingness to reconsider this bedrock principle of administrative law. In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, 568 U.S. __, No. 11-338 (Mar. 20, 2013), the Supreme Court followed its own precedent and deferred to a particular Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpretation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1365, and its implementing regulations. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the 7-1 majority opinion holding that the CWA does not require logging companies to secure permits for water pollution resulting from stormwater runoff of logging roads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
