Using unusually impatient language, the Supreme Court on Monday reversed a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that set aside two Kentucky murder convictions based on what the high court said were “the flimsiest of rationales.”

The Supreme Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. Matthews also in effect pulled rank on the Sixth Circuit, scolding it for “consulting its own precedents, rather than those of this court” in assessing the reasonableness of the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision in the case. The unsigned opinion said the Sixth Circuit’s decision amounted to “plain and repetitive error.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]