The court determined that the inspections and investigations conducted by the Public Utilities Commission in this matter constituted a "noncriminal investigation" for purposes of §708(b)(17) of the Right-to-Know Law and, as such, were not subject to public disclosure. Reversed.
April 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm’n v. Gilbert, PICS Case No. 12-0632 (Pa. Commw. March 27, 2012) Friedman, Sr. J. (14 pages).
The court determined that the inspections and investigations conducted by the Public Utilities Commission in this matter constituted a “noncriminal investigation” for purposes of §708(b)(17) of the Right-to-Know Law and, as such, were not subject to public disclosure. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
