A bill of more than $360,000 that was to be recovered by defendants for electronic discovery costs has been slashed by more than 90 percent, as Judge Thomas Vanaskie of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said for the three-judge panel that organizing electronic files cannot be considered part of the copying expense.

Since the volume of e-discovery has soared, courts have come down on both sides in awarding costs and the question of where the burden should fall has loomed large. Vanaskie issued an opinion March 16 that defines copies as only scanning and file-format conversion, awarding just $30,000 of the $365,000 that the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania had initially taxed in Race Tires America Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]