The post-polygraph interrogation constituted a "new interrogation" and exceeded the scope of the original Miranda warnings and appellant's counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress his post-polygraph statement. PCRA court's order denying appellant's petition for relief reversed.
March 13, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Hill, PICS Case No. 12-0500(Pa. Super. March 1, 2012) Donohue, J.; Panella, J., dissenting (30 pages).
The post-polygraph interrogation constituted a “new interrogation” and exceeded the scope of the original Miranda warnings and appellant’s counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress his post-polygraph statement. PCRA court’s order denying appellant’s petition for relief reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
