The state Supreme Court was asked to consider what the Commonwealth Court’s standard of appellate review is for final determinations of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records on appeal during the high court’s first-ever televised oral arguments session Sept. 13 in Philadelphia.
The issue in Bowling v. Office of Open Records was whether the Commonwealth Court’s review should be limited to the record compiled by the OOR and its appeals officer in such cases, as well as whether the court must defer to the OOR’s determinations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
