Appellee was unable to utilize the Environmental Immunity Act's protection and limited its protective reach was where pre-existing legal relationships manifested a party's intent not to participate in activity for which it would otherwise be shielded from liability pursuant to anti-SLAPP legislation. Reversed.
February 01, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Pennsbury Village Assocs., LLC v. McIntyre, PICS Case No. 11-0140 (Pa. Jan. 19, 2011) Eakin, J. (15 pages).
Appellee was unable to utilize the Environmental Immunity Act’s protection and limited its protective reach was where pre-existing legal relationships manifested a party’s intent not to participate in activity for which it would otherwise be shielded from liability pursuant to anti-SLAPP legislation. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
