There were material questions of fact regarding whether plaintiff made himself a limited-purpose public figure by virtue of his association with one or more targets of a criminal investigation who were ultimately charged. Defendants' motion for summary judgment denied.
January 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Joseph v. Scranton Times, L.P., PICS Case No. 10-3672 (C.P. Luzerne Dec. 13, 2010) Van Jura, J. (33 pages).
There were material questions of fact regarding whether plaintiff made himself a limited-purpose public figure by virtue of his association with one or more targets of a criminal investigation who were ultimately charged. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied.
'Old School' Expectations Plague Young Lawyer Mental Health—But Not All Predecessors Are Sympathetic
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
