A three-judge panel heard arguments about whether Boston federal prosecutor Jeffrey Auerhahn should face sanctions for judicial findings that he withheld exculpatory evidence, which led to a federal judge's ruling to release purported mobsters from prison.
December 13, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A three-judge panel heard arguments about whether Boston federal prosecutor Jeffrey Auerhahn should face sanctions for judicial findings that he withheld exculpatory evidence, which led to a federal judge’s ruling to release purported mobsters from prison.
The Dec. 9 hearing in In re Auerhahn covered several aspects of the Massachusetts Office of the Bar Counsel’s case against him.
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
