The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday wrestled with the meaning of the word “file” in a job retaliation case with potentially huge ramifications for workers who allege wage-and-hour violations by their employers.

Kevin Kasten sued his former employer, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., alleging that it fired him in retaliation for a series of verbal complaints about the illegal location of time clocks in his factory. A federal district court and the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him, holding that the anti-retaliation provision in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) protects internal complaints only if they are written.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]