As sexual harassment cases go, Seybert v. International Group Inc. doesn’t have especially shocking allegations, but the trial that began in U.S. District Court on Monday could nonetheless prove to be legally significant for several reasons.
Although plaintiff Susan Seybert points to just three “overtly sexual” incidents, she claims that her complaints about those events led to a much larger campaign of retaliatory harassment in which she was belittled and criticized and ultimately cheated out of a raise and an end-of-year bonus as a punishment for blowing the whistle.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
