“It seems odd that when your livelihood is being taken away, even if temporarily, … we only have to do preponderance of the evidence,” Brobson said.
April 11, 2024 at 12:18 PM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
A disciplinary case argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday prompted the justices to question whether it should be harder to prove attorney misconduct.
Several justices appeared to support adopting a higher evidentiary standard in attorney discipline cases, particularly given the ambiguity of the “clear and satisfactory” language currently in place.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: everythingpossible/Adobe Stock
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David N. Wecht. (Courtesy photo)
