As environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations become more integrated into corporate culture and investing, litigation risks grow, from potential “greenwashing” claims to attempts by certain states to prevent employee retirement funds from using ESG considerations as a metric for investing. This article will discuss current litigation trends in the ESG arena, practical suggestions for minimizing litigation risk and developments to watch.

Green Investing: Litigation Risks in Use of ESG Factors by Retirement Funds

Although the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and ESG are not frequently used in the same sentence, green investing in retirement funds has become a litigation hot button. In December 2022, the Department of Labor (DOL) published an amendment (the Biden Rule) to the Investment Duties Rules that had been promulgated in 2020 by the Trump DOL (the Trump Rules). The Biden Rule went into effect on Jan. 30, and explicitly allows retirement plan fiduciaries to consider ESG factors when making investment and shareholder proxy voting decisions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]