This column examines the media reporting of federal and state court decisions for accuracy and quality. Any examination of this area must take into consideration the background of the intense political atmosphere which colors much of the news today. For example, news reports of decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court usually contain a discussion of the votes of the conservative and liberal members of the court, implying the court decision goes along political lines.

There has been much criticism of the media by current and former judges. U.S. District Court Judge Gene Pratter for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said, in response to an inquiry by the writer of this column, “It is widely reported that the highly polarized political environment in the country, as well as the media accounts about key U.S. Supreme Court cases, have combined to dramatically impact the way Americans view all levels of the judicial system.” Pratter further explained, “Reporting about “high profile” cases dealing with the most difficult and divisive issues draw almost all the attention of the media and the public, and there’s little or attenuation to the bulk of the cases that courts decide every day.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]