“The majority may delude itself into thinking that its words will not impact anyone but the parties and the trial judge in this case, but the words it uses to convey its standards carry precedential effect and are not limited to this one dispute,” Justice David Wecht wrote.
June 22, 2023 at 07:36 PM
4 minute read
Litigation Reporter
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht seemed to rankle his colleagues on the bench with a dissenting opinion he entered in a child welfare case Wednesday.
Wecht’s strongly worded disagreement with the majority’s ruling met similarly sharp criticism from the majority, led by Justice Kevin Dougherty and joined by the remaining four justices.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David N. Wecht. Courtesy photo
Justice Kevin M. Dougherty. Courtesy photo
