James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse, which houses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in downtown Philadelphia, on April 3, 2021. (Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
A woman who opted to defend herself pro se at trial has no regrets, despite her being on the hook for a $1.4 million jury verdict in favor of a husband and wife who argued that she defamed them.
But facing a self-represented party as an opponent hardly provided an advantage for the plaintiffs this time around, according to their lawyer, Timothy Kolman of Kolman Law.
Timothy Kolman of Kolman Law. Courtesy photo
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
