On March 31, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in NCAA v. Alston, No. 20-512 (S.Ct. Dec. 16, 2020). In this article, we discuss the arguments made by counsel for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and questions posed by the justices; in a future article, we will do the same for the players’ arguments, leading up to our coverage of the court’s decision, likely this summer.

Previously in this case, the court granted certiorari and agreed to review two U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decisions that had affirmed the district court’s judgment that the NCAA’s and several collegiate athletic conferences’ rules regarding compensation paid to college athletes violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the district court’s judgment, applying the rule of reason following a bench trial, holding that there were procompetitive justifications for those rules that prohibited unlimited cash payments unrelated to education, but that there were no such procompetitive justifications for rules limiting education-related compensation and prohibiting such limits. The NCAA sought to reverse, whereas the players did not challenge the Ninth Circuit’s affirmance, which kept in place certain limits unrelated to education.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]