An expanded panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court has agreed to review a recent decision that said the federal statute limiting civil liability for the gun industry is unenforceable and “repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.”

On Thursday, the Superior Court granted en banc review of the case Gustafson v. Springfield, which, in September, led a three-judge Superior Court panel to determine that the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was unconstitutional. The ruling allowed the family of a teen killed in an accidental shooting to sue companies involved in the manufacture and sale of the gun.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]