Legal experts are divided on the potential success of a putative class action lawsuit against a dog-food distributor and manufacturers, accused of using rawhide in their “No-Hide” brand of products.

A major obstacle: proving fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment in the Connecticut case involving a Pennsylvania defendant, Georgia plaintiff and defense counsel from Illinois, Minnesota and the Nutmeg State.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]