The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has joined the Fourth, Fifth and Eleventh circuits in adopting the position that silent or unclear dismissal orders will be considered voluntary dismissals and voluntary first dismissals will be construed as without prejudice.

In a precedential Wednesday opinion in Papera v. Pennsylvania Quarry Bluestone, a unanimous three-judge panel of the appeals court ruled that plaintiffs whose lawsuit was closed when the parties reached a settlement agreement—which later fell through before it could be finalized—can file a new lawsuit making nearly identical claims because the district judge did not specify whether their case was dismissed with prejudice.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]