Just over a month out from the scheduled expiration date of a consent decree between feuding health care giants Highmark and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said it needs more information before it can decide whether the deadline should be extended.

The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, backed by Highmark, is seeking the extension, arguing that a broad modification provision in the consent decree allows for the termination date to be changed and that allowing the consent decree to expire while the two companies remain engaged in litigation would substantially harm hundreds of thousands of western Pennsylvania residents. UPMC has disputed that any harm would occur and argues that the deadline cannot be changed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]