Head Injury From Fallen Street Light Nets $2.75M Settlement
A man injured by a street light that was knocked over by a reversing truck agreed to settle his claims against multiple defendants for $2.75 million.
January 25, 2018 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
Gao v. City of Philadelphia
$2.75 million settlement
Date of Settle: June 30.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 151202745.
Mediator: Joseph Ricchiuti.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle, premises liability.
Injuries: Traumatic brain injury, spinal fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: John D. Pallante, Law Offices of John D. Pallante, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Timothy Bussard, commercial transportation specialist, and Andrew Verzilli, economist.
Defense Counsel: Andrew Kramer of Kane Pugh Knoell Troy & Kramer, Norristown; Donald Davis of Margolis Edelstein, Philadelphia, and Sheldon Kivell of the Philadelphia Law Department.
Defense Expert: Evan Kovalsky, orthopedic surgery.
Comment:
A man injured by a street light that was knocked over by a reversing truck agreed to settle his claims against multiple defendants for $2.75 million.
According to plaintiff Xue Ping Gao's settlement conference memo, he had been walking at the intersection of 10th and Apple streets in the Chinatown section of Philadelphia on April 23, 2015, when a man delivering musical equipment to the Trocadero Theatre knocked over a street light that fell on Gao.
The driver, William Everette, was employed by Janco LTD and had been driving a tractor trailer. According to Gao's memo, Everette had asked Graham Noel, an employee of the Trocadero, to help him park by stopping all motor vehicle traffic on 10th street.
Gao suffered a severe traumatic brain injury, as well as subarachnoid hemorrhage and post-concussive syndrome, according to his memo. He also suffered a herniation in his cervical spine and compression fractures in his thoracic spine. The memo said he also suffered from cognitive impairments, and mood disturbances as a result of the incident.
Gao sued the City of Philadelphia, the Trocadero and Janco, alleging negligence, negligent hiring, and that the placement of the light fixture was defective, as it had been placed too close to the curb. Gao's wife also sought a claim for loss of consortium.
Timothy Bussard, commercial transportation specialist, opined that Everette had been negligent and lacked adequate training. He also opined the Trocadero failed to control the loading and unloading area.
The defendants denied Gao's claims.
Gao's attorney John D. Pallante said that after the suit was filed he was able to obtain surveillance footage from several nearby stores, which provided multiple videos of the accident from differing angles.
“It was fortunate that Mr. Gao and his wife retained me shortly after the accident because I was able to immediately send an investigator and translator, which helped me obtain several surveillance videos and helped the case to resolve in a relatively expeditiousness manner,” he said.
According to court documents, the Trocadero defendants contributed $375,000 to the settlement, while the Janco defendants contributed $2,375,000, with $500,000 coming in the form of an annuity with a 10-year payout. Philadelphia did not contribute to the settlement.
Both Donald Davis of Margolis Edelstein and a paralegal for Andrew Kramer of Kane Pugh Knoell Troy & Kramer did not return a call for comment. Sheldon Kivell of the Philadelphia Law Department said the city had no comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Judge Rules $12M Crash Verdict Was Backed by Evidence as Case Heads to Appeal
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Reflects on Client's $1M Win Against Officers' No-Knock Search Warrant
4 minute readPunitive Damages Part of $3.8M Asbestos Verdict Pittsburgh Jury Awards Retired Boilermaker
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250